tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-339348712464762588.post8440593380985660350..comments2023-10-28T06:16:22.907-07:00Comments on The Jet Age: Biofuels a Costly Diversion for the Airline IndustryGregory Maxwellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14018544410005482774noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-339348712464762588.post-77710917623905038762019-11-18T16:48:22.214-08:002019-11-18T16:48:22.214-08:00
My husband left me for a younger woman and I was ...<br />My husband left me for a younger woman and I was devastated. Paul turned against me overnight without any warning. It happened last year, I was desperate so I used every single website that I could find with no results. A friend sent me the link of Robinson Buckler site and I contacted him. He started working with me on June. As a result from all of his wonderful work, my man and I are back together. I’m so happy and privileged to have such a great person like you on my side. Thank you! contact Robinsonbuckler@yahoo.com.... https://robinbuckler.com/<br />Celina Jeffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16326665565025421362noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-339348712464762588.post-68891072179946889532010-05-24T21:04:37.811-07:002010-05-24T21:04:37.811-07:00You make some good points about increasing yields ...You make some good points about increasing yields for corn and their is potential in this area, sugar as well for automobiles. But neither of these are good crops to derive jet fuel from. More research and testing is needed to find a solution that is sustainable and cost effective. But for the airlines to spend millions and probably more like billions to incorporate biofuels in their current immature state just doesn't make a lot of sense. Much in the same way that the current generation of electric cars don't have the battery life to make them a practical solution for most households. Perhaps the 3rd generation of biofuels will get us there.Gregory Maxwellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14018544410005482774noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-339348712464762588.post-86155594892128323542010-05-24T18:38:55.001-07:002010-05-24T18:38:55.001-07:00Are you saying "Drill, baby, drill?" in ...Are you saying "Drill, baby, drill?" in spite of our Texas oil President conceding that "We are addicted to oil."?<br /><br />I don't profess to be an expert but the figures you site for the amount of water needed to produce .26 gallons of biodiesel do not remotely pass the smell test for any of those crops. If you compare that performance to oil maybe you have to concede that it is more plausible that .26 gallons of oil can pollute 5,283 gallons of water. And that's with killing off entire industries of fishing and tourism.<br /><br />I also don't buy the carbon emissions argument concerning land use change. Growing more corn, for instance doesn't require more acres to be planted since the yield per acre has been rising over the last 100 years. We are now realizing record crop harvests on fewer acres with more sustainable cultivation and harvest practices. <br /><br />"Per acre corn yield has increased 371% since 1944. Introduction of biotechnology varieties has helped increase U.S. corn yields 30% since 1996 alone. Based on a combination of genomics and biotechnology, leading corn seed companies Monsanto and Pioneer project accelerated yield increases over the next two decades, with current yield nearly doubling by 2030." ( http://bio.org/ind/advbio/200802fact.asp ) <br /><br />That is to say - don't give up on biofuel alternatives. They are getting cleaner, cheaper, and more sustainable every year. Plus, dozens of new refineries are being built each year with smaller water and carbon footprints. Compare that with petroleum fuels that are getting dirtier and less sustainable each year. We haven't had one new oil refinery in 30 years. <br /><br />You can't be against biofuels without, in essence, supporting the status quo fossil paradigm - oil spills and all.C. Scott Millerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07991544140164207239noreply@blogger.com